It is currently Tue Aug 25, 2026 8:03 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 293 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:46 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 1:51 pm
Posts: 12152
Location: Somewhere east of Prescott, AZ along the old Santa Fe "Prescott & Eastern"
Dennis Storzek wrote:
In one articles someone made the statement that the cameragal was initially worried about the camera; it hadn't sunk in yet that she needed to be more concerned about saving her own skin. It brought back memories of yelling "F*ck the chainsaw, f*ck the chainsaw" at a new guy who looked like he was about to jump right in front of a train to rescue a chainsaw he'd forgotten to carry off when we'd cleared the track. It takes a while to internalize the proper order of concerns.


............ as reiterated once again by the most recent "stupid human trick" making the rounds of online railfan forums, a young woman who was struck and killed by a train while allegedly running back to retrieve her dropped cell phone........


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 6:40 pm 

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 10:54 am
Posts: 1186
Location: Tucson, Arizona
buzz_morris wrote:
…experts contacted by Variety say it is inconceivable that a railroad would allow shooting on an active rail line without having one of its own officials on site to ensure safety.
Asked whether there was a railroad official on site for the shoot, …“Union reps say it wasn’t a scheduled shooting day and no set medic or railroad safety officer was on set.”



So true. Even if they had gotten permission, there is no arguable reason to have a whole crew on a bridge or to place the actors there. Bridge decks are very dangerous to work on, even for those of us whose jobs require us to walk them. One of the movies that Warner Brothers shot at TVRM involved the actors jumping from the Chickamauga Creek bridge. For that scene, the film crew shot footage of the movie train approaching and crossing the bridge. A partial mockup of one bridge span was constructed by the scenery department on the lawn in front of the Grand Junction Depot. The jump scene was filmed using the mockup and edited in.

At the creek, additional shooting was done with stunt doubles jumping into the creek from a much lower elevation (the bridge is normally about 80 feet above the creek bed. At no time was there any reason for the actors to walk out on the actual bridge. This is why we have editing and special effects-they got the shots they wanted without taking any unnecessary risks. Then again, that was a major production by a big name studio with A list actors.

_________________
"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."- Conductor Nimrod Bell, 1896


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:21 am 

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:25 pm
Posts: 512
Yes, I have to agree, the whole: "we got permission, and they told us we'd have 60 seconds to get off the track if a train came and blew it's horn" is total BS from the film company.

Any authorized presence on the tracks is coordinated with "flags" on the ground to stop/allow a train to proceed.

My Father (an NYC/PC/Conrail locomotive engineer) was held up running an Amtrak train in upstate NY because an official "flag" (person on the ground with an actual red flag (in the old days) or a radio nowadays) was not present at the site of a "track restriction". Specific instructions to the operating crew was something like; "from 8:01am until 4:01 pm, Approach MP xxx.y at restricted speed prepared to STOP" and "DO NOT PASS MP xxx.y" without permission from the "flag".

In this case the "flag" was an employee from a contractor hired to repair an under track culvert. On the day in question the construction contractor finished up early (before 4:01PM) AND SIMPLY WENT HOME. The train approached the restriction, attempted to contact the "flag" via radio and then stopped. In this case the dispatcher cannot simply say; it's OK go ahead since the "flag" has total control of any train movements over that section of track.

It took an hour or so for the dispatcher to contact the contractor and confirm that the track was clear and the train could proceed. Quite a good fail safe procedure, what if there was an accident at the construction site and the "flag" was incapacitated ?

Sounds to me like these film crew management folks are fibbing a bit (actually a whole hell of a lot), no railroad would allow folks on/near it's tracks without a formal agreement detailing When/Where/Who/How the track restriction would take place.

What a tragic (but sadly foreseeable accident), my condolences to the family of the young women.

I have a 1941 NYCRR Employee Timetable, and one of the rules (for the operating personnel) is; "In the event of a fatality on Railroad property do not make any statements regarding fault" (paraphrased slightly, but the intent was to let the "legal department" handle things).

Cheers, Kevin.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:28 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:01 pm
Posts: 1755
Location: SouthEast Pennsylvania
NYCRRson wrote:
"we got permission, and they told us we'd have 60 seconds to get off the track
if a train came and blew it's horn".
Was that enough time to get the bed off the bridge?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:56 am 

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 2:22 pm
Posts: 1543
The NTSB has released their preliminary report, but with little information other than the basic facts of the accident, and a photo of the site that I have not seen before. The report does not confirm nor deny whether the film company received any permission from CSX:

https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/201 ... Prelim.pdf

The last information that I read was that the Wayne County, GA Sheriff’s Department is conducting a homicide investigation that they expect to complete in about a month. I anticipate that they will conclude that there was a homicide, so I expect they will bring charges against someone.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:31 am 

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:02 pm
Posts: 1881
Location: Back in NE Ohio
NYCRRson wrote:
Yes, I have to agree, the whole: "we got permission, and they told us we'd have 60 seconds to get off the track if a train came and blew it's horn" is total BS from the film company.

Any authorized presence on the tracks is coordinated with "flags" on the ground to stop/allow a train to proceed.

My Father (an NYC/PC/Conrail locomotive engineer) was held up running an Amtrak train in upstate NY because an official "flag" (person on the ground with an actual red flag (in the old days) or a radio nowadays) was not present at the site of a "track restriction". Specific instructions to the operating crew was something like; "from 8:01am until 4:01 pm, Approach MP xxx.y at restricted speed prepared to STOP" and "DO NOT PASS MP xxx.y" without permission from the "flag".

In this case the "flag" was an employee from a contractor hired to repair an under track culvert. On the day in question the construction contractor finished up early (before 4:01PM) AND SIMPLY WENT HOME. The train approached the restriction, attempted to contact the "flag" via radio and then stopped. In this case the dispatcher cannot simply say; it's OK go ahead since the "flag" has total control of any train movements over that section of track.

It took an hour or so for the dispatcher to contact the contractor and confirm that the track was clear and the train could proceed. Quite a good fail safe procedure, what if there was an accident at the construction site and the "flag" was incapacitated ?

Sounds to me like these film crew management folks are fibbing a bit (actually a whole hell of a lot), no railroad would allow folks on/near it's tracks without a formal agreement detailing When/Where/Who/How the track restriction would take place.

What a tragic (but sadly foreseeable accident), my condolences to the family of the young women.

I have a 1941 NYCRR Employee Timetable, and one of the rules (for the operating personnel) is; "In the event of a fatality on Railroad property do not make any statements regarding fault" (paraphrased slightly, but the intent was to let the "legal department" handle things).

Cheers, Kevin.


What you are describing is, in the CSX rule book, rule 89/707, on-track worker rules. One time I was coming into a work area that was scheduled to start and could not raise the Employee-In-Charge on the radio. I had to stop, finally get a hold of the dispatcher who was able to get the EIC on his cell phone. Turns out the EIC was stuck in a traffic jam from a wreck on I-95, and we sat there for almost an hour until he was able to get within radio range to personally give us permission through his limits. So, yeah, CSX takes this sort of thing seriously.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:43 pm 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 5:55 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Warren, PA
My introduction to true safety culture happened in Conrail in the 80's, where the usual 'trip home from work' paralleled the Southern Tier main for about 9 miles. Very surprised to see an 'extremely late' OIEL parked at the WO home signals, I'd passed a track crew about 4 miles down the line. Even more curious when I drove by and saw the signals were set to green in the train direction of travel. And there she sat. And sat.

About an hour later I couldn't take it anymore, went back, and walked across the cornfield to the cab. Crew was yelling at me.... got close enough.... You a railfan? Can you do us a favor? Can you drive down there and tell that track foreman to get on the %$$#!! radio and give us our $@@!! railroad back!!! Tell him superintendent XXXXXXX is on board and we've been sitting here for six hours!!!!

Which I did, and after the foreman made quite a show of yelling at me for walking onto his railroad to deliver a message, was followed by a 'bug out' of an entire mechanized track crew to clear the main. Radio was apparently shut off. I earned some points with that crew that day. Learned that No communication = No move.

But OIEL had written orders on that track crew, until they got the radio clear, NOBODY but NOBODY was moving west of that signal. They could have 'crept up' at restricted speed, but they didn't. Nope, not an inch. That was the first episode of many that convinced me that the environment was changing that I'd seen in the 70's.

I remember being at a memorable pre-merger auditorium meeting in Buffalo, NY with CSXT, NS, and lots of shippers and shortlines. Railroad protocol dictated that there HAD to be a safety briefing before a meeting, no exceptions, so we got five minutes on paper cuts. No exceptions. So the press commentary that railroads have the most structured safety culture of any industry with the possible exception of airlines, yeah.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:47 am 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:01 pm
Posts: 1755
Location: SouthEast Pennsylvania
The linked NTSB report mentions that the train was moving at 58 m.p.h. with a speed limit of 70 mp.h. Is it possible to hear the whistle when that train is 1 minute (about a mile) away?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 2:28 am 

Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:41 am
Posts: 3971
Location: Inwood, W.Va.
JimBoylan wrote:
The linked NTSB report mentions that the train was moving at 58 m.p.h. with a speed limit of 70 mp.h. Is it possible to hear the whistle when that train is 1 minute (about a mile) away?


Under most conditions you should hear one at that distance; I know I've heard steam whistles from at least three times that far.

However, there still should have been flag protection, permission from the railroad, etc. All of this seems to have been tragically missing--especially on a railroad hosting passenger trains at 70 mph.

Truthfully, as others have pointed out, they shouldn't even have been there in the first place.

I certainly wouldn't have picked such a location, even if I thought I could get permission for it; it's too busy.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ... 525AAtoTQk


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:52 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:45 pm
Posts: 258
JimBoylan wrote:
The linked NTSB report mentions that the train was moving at 58 m.p.h. with a speed limit of 70 mp.h. Is it possible to hear the whistle when that train is 1 minute (about a mile) away?


Under the right conditions, I've heard air horns at well over 5 miles away.

_________________
Restoring MILW X-5000: The Milwaukee Road's Dynamometer car

Restoration website


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:09 pm 

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:45 am
Posts: 1087
A blogger for the Atlanta Journal Constitution's website has an update:
AJC.com: Questions, anger remain following filming fatality (Monday, March 24, 2014)

According to that story, the County Sheriff has confirmed that the crew did not have permission to be on the tracks:
Quote:
Officials from the Wayne County Sheriff's Office told the AJC last week the investigation is carrying on and that it "could be a while" before any determinations are made, and had no new developments to report other than to confirm, "CSX did NOT give them permission to be on the tracks."


The AJC update also links to this story:
Los Angeles Times: Sarah Jones' death calls attention to film crews' safety (March 21, 2014)

Here is a short, fair-use quote from the LA Time's article:
Quote:
Union representatives and Wayne County Sheriff John Carter have said there was no railroad representative on site. The "Guidelines for Railroad Safety" bulletin, published by an industry safety committee, states that railroad representatives should always be on site when crews are filming around trains, and that no objects should be placed on the track.

"It's not complicated," said cinematographer John Lindley, who said he took a two-day class on train safety before filming the 1995 movie "Money Train." "If you have a permit to film on or near railway tracks, there is always a representative of the railway with you, and that person has a wireless contact with at least a dispatcher who knows exactly where the train is."

On a previous Georgia location shoot in 2012, Unclaimed Freight violated permit rules while shooting scenes for "CBGB," a film about the legendary New York nightclub, said William Hammargren, interim film services administrator for the City of Savannah Film Office.

The firm's crews removed a stop sign from a street without permission and failed to replace it, he said. "It was definitely a safety issue," he said.

_________________
--
Chris Webster


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:17 pm 

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:45 am
Posts: 1087
The Associated Press published an update: Death of Ga. film worker 'senseless,' father says (April 10, 2014). A short excerpt:
Quote:
Sheriff's investigators say the production crew had permission to be on private property surrounding the tracks, but not on the tracks, which are owned by CSX Railroad. Results of their investigation will soon go to prosecutors, who are weighing possible criminal charges. The National Transportation Safety Board and the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration are also investigating.

"I think when everything's done and said, it will be clear the railroad never told them they could be on the tracks," said Joe Gardner, the sheriff's lead investigator on the train collision.


Production of the movie is being restarted according to this update from IATSE Local 479

_________________
--
Chris Webster


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:00 pm 

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:45 am
Posts: 1087
Some updates:

April 14, Wayne County, Georgia Sheriff John Carter said his investigation was complete and that his office will lay out the case to the district attorney in a meeting scheduled for April 21: Variety: ‘Midnight Rider’ Investigation: Sheriff Will Leave Question of Criminal Charges to D.A

April 23. William Hurt has pulled out of his starring role in “Midnight Rider,” in which he was set to play musician Gregg Allman: Variety: ‘Midnight Rider’ Star Pulls Out of Movie After Fatal Accident

April 25. Midnight Rider subject Gregg Allman has implored director Randall Miller to stop production following the death of camera assistant Sarah Jones: UPI - Gregg Allman implores 'Midnight Rider' director Randall Miller to stop production

April 25, Drop Dead Diva executive producer Robert J. Wilson, whose show Jones worked on, is helping organize a Georgia concert featuring music from Collective Soul and Shane Dwight: The Hollywood Reporter: Concert Benefiting Sarah Jones Scholarship to Take Place in May

_________________
--
Chris Webster


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 3:29 pm 

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 2:22 pm
Posts: 1543
From the article:

“Carter said that one of the reasons that they are not pursuing their own criminal charges is the unusual nature of the incident, including “conflicting stories” of whether the production had permission to be on the tracks.”

Conflicting stories? One story is that CSX had not given permission to the film crew to be on the tracks. What is the story that conflicts with that? I have yet to hear one.

And why are we not being told the whole story about the so-called “conflicting stories.”


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Film crewman killed by train
PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 4:38 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Posts: 2696
Location: Pac NW, via North Florida
Ron Travis wrote:
From the article:

“Carter said that one of the reasons that they are not pursuing their own criminal charges is the unusual nature of the incident, including “conflicting stories” of whether the production had permission to be on the tracks.”

Conflicting stories? One story is that CSX had not given permission to the film crew to be on the tracks. What is the story that conflicts with that? I have yet to hear one.

And why are we not being told the whole story about the so-called “conflicting stories.”
standard procedure for a pending lawsuit, nobody wants to lay all their cards on the table.
Looks like this movie is done. there's a flip side to each way to look at this; it's sad that this movie will never be made now, especially if you consider the death was totally for nothing without even then finished film to show for it, and there's the thought that no movie is worth any life lost...

_________________
Lee Bishop


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 293 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: