It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 1:25 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2022 11:45 am 

Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 1:37 pm
Posts: 2213
Quote:
"... the argument as to the underground utilities is a self-serving fabrication intended to end this story - soon."


I don't think it is a 'fabrication' so much as it's risk minimization on the part of an organization that doesn't care about 'preservation' but wants to avoid even the least chance of problems 'on their watch'.

I do wonder whether someone outside the Danbury museum could influence either the redevelopment management company or the new site owners to facilitate at least moving the equipment out of present danger.

What was the "chain of custody" of the donated S locomotive between its donation and the time Danbury came to own it?

_________________
R.M.Ellsworth


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2022 5:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:05 pm
Posts: 1053
Location: MA
Overmod wrote:
Quote:
"... the argument as to the underground utilities is a self-serving fabrication intended to end this story - soon."


I don't think it is a 'fabrication' so much as it's risk minimization on the part of an organization that doesn't care about 'preservation' but wants to avoid even the least chance of problems 'on their watch'.

I do wonder whether someone outside the Danbury museum could influence either the redevelopment management company or the new site owners to facilitate at least moving the equipment out of present danger.

What was the "chain of custody" of the donated S locomotive between its donation and the time Danbury came to own it?
The property owners are willing to let the locomotives be moved out of the way of the construction that needs to happen where they are for temporary storage... So they just need to pay $250,000 for the move on top of what they need to pay to transport them already.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2022 8:54 am 

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2022 7:46 pm
Posts: 1
twofoot wrote:
Rick Rowlands wrote:
Those two units could not have been considered "preserved" with a straight face for at least the last decade. It is more accurate to say that they "exist". Preservation is not simply letting something old just continue to hang around. Preservation is a participation sport.


Rick, I think you mean 2 decades. It always amused me when someone would "rediscover" the locos and sound the alarm for their preservation. Then the usual "does IRM know" would be replied. BTW, your "Preservation is a participation sport" needs to become a t-shirt.

The Danbury Rust Museum continues to be one of the most mis-run organizations I have ever seen. They continue to "save" equipment with no real plan in place. They take donations that disappear into the ether. They continue to let the collection that they do have rust into the ground while spending literally nothing on their upkeep or "salvation".

Perhaps if they could rethink their non-viable business model based on a "train ride" which consists of 5mph over a thousand feet (if that) of bad order track followed by a 4mph reverse move, they might be able to generate some actual revenue and/or interest. They also need new leadership that has perhaps run an actual successful business before. (Crazy idea, I know)

I remember thinking how nice that NYC wood caboose they have was starting to look after it finally received a coat of paint. It now looks worse than when it started. Same thing for all of the non-relevant Canadian equipment clogging the yard. Sell something to pay for a real restoration project? Unthinkable!

Typical Danbury bullsh*t.

C.



Sounds like somebody has quite the axe to grind, disgruntled former employee?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2022 12:07 pm 

Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 10:08 am
Posts: 705
RCD wrote:
Overmod wrote:
Quote:
"... the argument as to the underground utilities is a self-serving fabrication intended to end this story - soon."


I don't think it is a 'fabrication' so much as it's risk minimization on the part of an organization that doesn't care about 'preservation' but wants to avoid even the least chance of problems 'on their watch'.

I do wonder whether someone outside the Danbury museum could influence either the redevelopment management company or the new site owners to facilitate at least moving the equipment out of present danger.

What was the "chain of custody" of the donated S locomotive between its donation and the time Danbury came to own it?
The property owners are willing to let the locomotives be moved out of the way of the construction that needs to happen where they are for temporary storage... So they just need to pay $250,000 for the move on top of what they need to pay to transport them already.

I hope the people at the DRM had an attorney reivew the terms of the gas line owner's easement. They may not want DRM to roll the locos on track over the buried line but that does not necessarily mean they have the right to stop them. Even if they do have the right to control surface movement over the pipeline, who has the burden of proof regarding assertion of potential damage to the pipeline?


Last edited by Scranton Yard on Fri Dec 02, 2022 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2022 10:44 pm 

Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 11:54 am
Posts: 1773
Location: New Franklin, OH
I don’t think this pipeline thing has been fleshed out quite yet. How did the equipment get into that site? Over the pipeline? Would’ve had to. Did it magically float in? Don’t think so. How many cars and locomotives ran over that pipeline over the years? Quite a few I’ll bet. Suddenly it’s not safe to do so? Hmmmm….

At thirty feet down and with the load distribution through the ground itself as well as the distribution via the track structure, I’d think that pipeline wouldn’t have any idea that a locomotive just crossed above it. I think it may have been a canned response from the pipeline owner and possibly wasn’t really looked at if at all.

IMHO, of course. I could be proven wrong.

_________________
Eric Schlentner
Turner of Wrenches, Drawer of Things


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2022 11:05 am 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 11:26 am
Posts: 4642
Location: Maine
This is a matter of people who don't understand and/care about the historic value of what they see as simply"old, rusty, trains" and other people who are just obstructing because they can. Allowing the four locomotive to deteriorate over time is the fault of the title holders, and acting before total deterioration would have made it a non-issue. Furthermore, why some old rusty trains are worthy of saving and the others are not, is something the antagonists just don't "get". A very well planned defense of the equipment, including a Lionel model of the "S" unit, and advertisements heralding the new service into GCT should be mounted. Public ignorance is the enemy. Why the equipment should be saved and showing that preservation benefits everyone is your best tool. Newspapers, television, radio, are you friends in meeting the objective. Don't vilify the opposition, but show why scrapping will be a total loss to history, would be my suggested approach.

_________________
"It's only impossible until it's done." -Nelson Mandela


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 4:46 am 

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:29 pm
Posts: 34
Location: Junee, NSW, Australia
They’re done for. Asking for donations isn’t enough, sadly, and the situation has become critical.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 12:31 pm 

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:14 pm
Posts: 205
hfmalone wrote:
twofoot wrote:
Rick Rowlands wrote:
Those two units could not have been considered "preserved" with a straight face for at least the last decade. It is more accurate to say that they "exist". Preservation is not simply letting something old just continue to hang around. Preservation is a participation sport.


Rick, I think you mean 2 decades. It always amused me when someone would "rediscover" the locos and sound the alarm for their preservation. Then the usual "does IRM know" would be replied. BTW, your "Preservation is a participation sport" needs to become a t-shirt.

The Danbury Rust Museum continues to be one of the most mis-run organizations I have ever seen. They continue to "save" equipment with no real plan in place. They take donations that disappear into the ether. They continue to let the collection that they do have rust into the ground while spending literally nothing on their upkeep or "salvation".

Perhaps if they could rethink their non-viable business model based on a "train ride" which consists of 5mph over a thousand feet (if that) of bad order track followed by a 4mph reverse move, they might be able to generate some actual revenue and/or interest. They also need new leadership that has perhaps run an actual successful business before. (Crazy idea, I know)

I remember thinking how nice that NYC wood caboose they have was starting to look after it finally received a coat of paint. It now looks worse than when it started. Same thing for all of the non-relevant Canadian equipment clogging the yard. Sell something to pay for a real restoration project? Unthinkable!

Typical Danbury bullsh*t.

C.



Sounds like somebody has quite the axe to grind, disgruntled former employee?


Hardly. Long time Danbury resident with eyes. Not everyone in the area is blind to your operation.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 10:35 pm 

Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:16 am
Posts: 1998
In the oil drilling industry they frequently haul diesel power units nearly as heavy as the weight that these locomotives could be trimmed to (by removing their trucks, fuel tanks, and pilot end plates). The oil drilling power skid units have angled "ski" ends, and a flat base plate, with a cable trunion at each corner, and are hauled along the ground by a bulldozer.

Maybe the railroad preservation people should look to the oil drilling folks for some ideas.

PC

_________________
Advice from the multitude costs nothing and is often worth just that. (EMD-1945)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:26 pm 

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:10 pm
Posts: 1182
A few years ago, a fellow in Colorado or maybe New Mexico moved a locomotive to a new display site in a community by loading it onto a large steel plate and then hauled it through town with a surplus military tank recovery tractor. I imagine it slid right over sewer and water lines.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 4:20 am 

Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 12:25 am
Posts: 13
I don't know the situation fully here. I also don't know the quality of the ground (will the ground freeze solid anytime soon?), but if it may help:

I have seen an image of several bulldozers (likely D-9 Caterpillars) pulling together with chains a large multi-story steel structure (like a very large drilling rig) over dirt. Unfortunately, I can't seem to locate that picture on the Internet.

At any rate, could a panel of track be secured to a "sled" of steel plate near the locomotive and then roll the locomotive onto the track that is on the "sled". Some appropriate chains/cables would likely need to be applied to keep the locomotive secure from rolling and from tipping over. Disconnect the rails (presumably jointed) and drag the locomotive and the panel(s) of track to the desired location to await transfer to a trailer?

Possibly a related question: is the museum willing to give up ownership to another organization (presuming that there is an organization with funds/equipment) and is there enough time left if funds are the problem?

From the other posts, it does seem like the situation hasn't become desperate enough for contractors, developer, etc. to be willing to find solutions. Naturally, no private business/utility/etc. wants to sign up for risk or costs that they don't have to take on until they don't have another choice.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 11:30 am 

Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 1:51 pm
Posts: 11482
Location: Somewhere east of Prescott, AZ along the old Santa Fe "Prescott & Eastern"
Awesome Steam wrote:
From the other posts, it does seem like the situation hasn't become desperate enough for contractors, developer, etc. to be willing to find solutions. Naturally, no private business/utility/etc. wants to sign up for risk or costs that they don't have to take on until they don't have another choice.


Here's what's apparently the problem:

The contractors, developers, pipeline owner, etc. have NO motivation to find "solutions" aside from "get your junk out of our way or else."

The museum and/or would-be saviors do not have the resources to remove these locos in the alloted time, with or without the cooperation of the property owners/developers.

Mentally, I've written them off. I'd LIKE to be proven wrong.........


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 12:36 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2021 4:36 pm
Posts: 217
Alexander D. Mitchell IV wrote:
Mentally, I've written them off. I'd LIKE to be proven wrong.........


I had admittedly long considered these to be "dead men walking" so to speak, then Danbury announced their plan to save them and I was pleasantly surprised, now that it's looking like they might be cut up, I'm back to my original mental state of "Well, I knew this was coming."

It sucks, losing the first mass-produced electric locomotive and the last surviving T-motor, but the whole mess really started decades ago. The original group basically abandoned them there, and then Danbury took ownership of them almost a decade ago and seemingly waited until "Ahhh, they absolutely have to me moved NOW" to try and save them.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 3:40 pm 

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 175
Location: At large
The passenger cars and two diesels were scrapped over the course of the last week. All that is left as of today were the frames and trucks of the RS3 and U25B.

_________________
Matt Giardino
ALCO Historical & Technical Society


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Danbury: RS3 Beyond Hope, U25B Cost-Prohibitive To Move
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 7:24 pm 

Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 12:25 am
Posts: 13
Regarding the natural gas line:


Quote:
I don’t think this pipeline thing has been fleshed out quite yet. How did the equipment get into that site? Over the pipeline? Would’ve had to. Did it magically float in? Don’t think so. How many cars and locomotives ran over that pipeline over the years? Quite a few I’ll bet. Suddenly it’s not safe to do so? Hmmmm….

At thirty feet down and with the load distribution through the ground itself as well as the distribution via the track structure, I’d think that pipeline wouldn’t have any idea that a locomotive just crossed above it. I think it may have been a canned response from the pipeline owner and possibly wasn’t really looked at if at all.


There are several examples of old underground natural gas pipelines catching fire and causing extensive damage (e.g. San Bruno, CA). A different take on this: if the natural gas company is concerned about damage to the pipeline buried 30 feet down then it seems that they ought to be very concerned about construction equipment and earth moving activities as well. I would think if they are concerned about a train moving slowly over track (which distributes the load) that they need to consider shutting the pipeline down for the duration of the construction (8 months was listed previously).

Quick internet search: fully loaded earth moving scraper can weigh 125 tons (or more?). The forces of combined weight of a scraper and shearing on the dirt by the scraper should also be a concern (not to mention including when the scraper is pushed by one or more bulldozers).

The judgement to say earth moving activities with heavy equipment are safe while a slow train movement on steel track is not safe seems tenuous. There has to be such an extremely narrow civil engineering window where that is true (if it exists at all) that I would think a reasonable civil engineer evaluating the situation would not be willing to recommend the construction and earth moving without also accepting that the locomotive movement is acceptable as well.

The natural gas company is not going to like dealing with whatever costs are associated with shutting down the pipeline for the ~8 months construction for safety reasons. It would be politically "touchy," but I think the natural gas company would or should, in the interest of public safety, "sharpen the pencil," to do a more detailed analysis of the risk that is involved in the construction (not to mention the locomotive movement).

If the nearby homeowners are concerned about hazardous dust, maybe they ought to consider what happened to the subdivision destroyed by fire in San Bruno, CA. That said stirring things up often doesn't help although maybe some reasonableness will result if there are credible reasons for all concerned think about it a bit more. I would say the initial answer by the natural gas company is pointing out a good reason that their own answer should be re-visited.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


 Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 126 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: