Railway Preservation News
http://rypn.org/forums/

Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks
http://rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=44702
Page 4 of 5

Author:  Alexander D. Mitchell IV [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

The fact that 1187/4 was one of the ONLY Reading steamers to survive to 1962, and the ONLY one in any way appropriate for a non-mainline operation, no doubt played THE major role in the loco being acquired and staying around as long as it did. Whether we want to acknowledge it or not, at least some of the founders of the Strasburg (not all, but enough) were rabid railfans of the first order. The Lancaster area had PRR, Reading, and some traction lines.

I'm sure that, long-term, the folks that were responsible for 4 showing up wished that had been able to get ANY other "mid-sized" Reading steamer such as a G3 Pacific or 2-8-0. And any of the larger Reading power--a 4-8-4, 2-10-2, or "Malley"--would have eaten them alive in coal and track repair costs.

One aspect of the Reading is that its later surviving steam power was somewhat brutishly heavy and massive. Even if one had been available (and it wasn't), consider: a 78-ton CN 0-6-0 "beat the snot" out of the Strasburg's track just before the 4 showed up.

Supposing you were a die-hard PRR fan and insisted you wanted a PRR steamer for your "collection." The ones at the RR Museum of Pa. are "off limits," at least in official policy. That leaves you with the 0-10-0 Reuben Wells and B4a 0-6-0 643 to try to buy. That's it. That's all. End of discussion. Good luck.
That's the kind of situation the "railfan" part of the Strasburg was up against in the early 1960s.

Author:  Scranton Yard [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

Dave Lewandoski wrote:
Lighten up Francis.

Uncle Hulka?

Author:  Dave [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

Sandy, you're forgetting about the one in the quarry.

Author:  NS6770fan [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

Alexander D. Mitchell IV wrote:
The fact that 1187/4 was one of the ONLY Reading steamers to survive to 1962, and the ONLY one in any way appropriate for a non-mainline operation, no doubt played THE major role in the loco being acquired and staying around as long as it did.


Actually, you’re forgetting the lesser known Reading 0-6-0 that used to be right across the street from the 1187. Technically speaking, 1251 would be excellent for serving a roundhouse alongside 1187 (Good luck getting her out of RRMPA however).

Author:  Dave Lewandoski [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

JJJ got 763 out of Virgiana.....and museums are hurting like everyone else....money talks if someone wants it bad enough.

Author:  PaulWWoodring [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

Dave Lewandoski wrote:
JJJ got 763 out of Virgiana.....and museums are hurting like everyone else....money talks if someone wants it bad enough.


763 was in Roanoke because N&W took over the NKP and got the steam they still owned at that time. The loco had no direct relationship to Roanoke or the N&W, so letting it go to rationalize the collection made sense and raised needed funds.

Author:  Steamguy73 [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

Alexander D. Mitchell IV wrote:
Supposing you were a die-hard PRR fan and insisted you wanted a PRR steamer for your "collection." The ones at the RR Museum of Pa. are "off limits," at least in official policy. That leaves you with the 0-10-0 Reuben Wells and B4a 0-6-0 643 to try to buy. That's it. That's all. End of discussion. Good luck.
That's the kind of situation the "railfan" part of the Strasburg was up against in the early 1960s.


Well, there are of course other examples. Don’t forget the 0-6-0 in Delaware, the I1 4483, and of course the locomotive that shall not be named in Altoona. It even expands a little if you include narrow gauge operations, but that’s getting a bit off track.

That being said, I see your point with the Reading power. I do remember a very old and long thread about “near misses” on here that mentioned a G3 apparently was planned for preservation in the city of Reading, but plans fell through.

I believe the Reading only ever donated 1 modern locomotive to any organization, and that was T1 2124. All others were either purchased directly from the Reading (think 1251, 1187, and 2102) or from third parties (2100 and 2101). So consider it very lucky we were able to get this many locomotives from the Reading in preservation, and just think of all of the other anthracite roads that don’t have near the preservation numbers: CNJ, LV, DL&W, L&NE, L&HR, Erie, O&W and I’ll even throw the D&H into that mix. Out of those 8 roads, we have a combined 5 fairly modern preserved locomotives total in that bunch: two camelbacks with 4 driving wheels, two 0-6-0’s, and a 2-6-0. That’s it.

Author:  Ed Kapuscinski [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 1:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

Ok, that all totally makes sense then.

It was all about not passing up a great opportunity to do something cool.

And, as we can see, it all worked out well in the end. The 1187 is going to have a good home and the Strasburg got a little work out of her in the process.

I'd also definitely say that being in a situation where your new engine isn't powerful enough because of your number of riders is a good problem to have.

Author:  Dave Lewandoski [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

PaulWWoodring wrote:

and raised needed funds.


THIS. I've seen RR,plane,other museums let items go they normaly wouldn't...but ya gotta pay the bills.

Author:  jrevans [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 643 to AOS

misterwandle wrote:
I suggest that you ask the cities of Pittsburgh and McKees Rocks, as their COVID virus regulations have prevented AoSRM from loading and moving #643. Whenever they give the OK, then #643 will be shipped by rail to Sugarcreek.
John B. Corns


Thanks for the update, John. I'm glad to hear that the 1187 will be in good hands.

Very interesting to hear that the 643 will be shipped by rail now. I've been following the updates, and I remember reading that it was originally going to be transported via truck, so this is an exciting change.

Sorry to hear that Allegheny County and some of the surrounding cities are being extremely restrictive with regards to activities. As a PA resident, I follow the daily status updates, and the important numbers have been good for a while.

I bet it is so frustrating for you guys to be stopped in the middle of the project!

Author:  hullmat991 [ Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 643 to AOS

jrevans wrote:
misterwandle wrote:

Sorry to hear that Allegheny County and some of the surrounding cities are being extremely restrictive with regards to activities. As a PA resident, I follow the daily status updates, and the important numbers have been good for a while.

I bet it is so frustrating for you guys to be stopped in the middle of the project!


As a Pittsburgh resident, I can say there is absolutely a reason for the restrictions being as tough as they are. As soon as the county initially loosened restrictions our cases spiked. Partly due to the fact that there are too many people out there not covering their faces and getting in everybody else's personal spaces.

Author:  Kelly Anderson [ Fri Aug 14, 2020 8:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

Ed Kapuscinski wrote:
Ok, that all totally makes sense then.

It was all about not passing up a great opportunity to do something cool.

And, as we can see, it all worked out well in the end. The 1187 is going to have a good home and the Strasburg got a little work out of her in the process.

I'd also definitely say that being in a situation where your new engine isn't powerful enough because of your number of riders is a good problem to have.
In 1962, there was very little in the way of strategic planning going on at SRC. They had only gotten #31 running two years before, and probably heard that #4 was available and operable, and snapped it up, since they weren't in a position to take on anything that wasn't already running. Once on the line, it's steaming deficiencies became sadly evident, and SRC was in no position knowledge wise to do anything about it, so it quickly became very 2nd fiddle, then 3rd fiddle when #1223 came into service in 1965.

Of course if they hadn't followed their foamer tendencies in 1962, CF&I would have no doubt run her through a blast furnace without a second thought, so all's well that ends well.

Author:  Ed Kapuscinski [ Fri Aug 14, 2020 12:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

Kelly Anderson wrote:
Ed Kapuscinski wrote:
Ok, that all totally makes sense then.

It was all about not passing up a great opportunity to do something cool.

And, as we can see, it all worked out well in the end. The 1187 is going to have a good home and the Strasburg got a little work out of her in the process.

I'd also definitely say that being in a situation where your new engine isn't powerful enough because of your number of riders is a good problem to have.
In 1962, there was very little in the way of strategic planning going on at SRC. They had only gotten #31 running two years before, and probably heard that #4 was available and operable, and snapped it up, since they weren't in a position to take on anything that wasn't already running. Once on the line, it's steaming deficiencies became sadly evident, and SRC was in no position knowledge wise to do anything about it, so it quickly became very 2nd fiddle, then 3rd fiddle when #1223 came into service in 1965.

Of course if they hadn't followed their foamer tendencies in 1962, CF&I would have no doubt run her through a blast furnace without a second thought, so all's well that ends well.


Makes total sense to me! And I agree, you guys did a good thing giving her somewhere safe to hang out until she found her forever home.

Author:  misterwandle [ Fri Aug 14, 2020 6:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

'I suggest that you ask the cities of Pittsburgh and McKees Rocks, as their COVID virus regulations have prevented AoSRM from loading and moving #643. Whenever they give the OK, then #643 will be shipped by rail to Sugarcreek.
John B. Corns'

"Thanks for the update, John . . . Very interesting to hear that the 643 will be shipped by rail now. I've been following the updates, and I remember reading that it was originally going to be transported via truck, so this is an exciting change.

Don't get too excited about the possibility of seeing a 2-10-4 rolling down the main line for its shipping by rail to Sugarcreek. It was impossible to get #643 out of McKees Rocks in one piece either by rail or by highway truck. AoSRM said some time ago that #643's boiler had been separated from its frame, and that the disparate pieces would be going to Sugarcreek on two big flatcars. AoSRM will keep everyone apprised of their progress in this regard. Be safe
John B. Corns

Author:  EJ Berry [ Fri Aug 14, 2020 9:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Reading Camelback LOADED on trucks

An interesting industrial locomotive coincidence in Birdsboro and East Strasburg.

in the late 1930's, there was a quarry in Birdsboro ("BE"; the other side of the river from the E and G Brooke plant) that had a 19th century 2-8-0 with a Belpaire firebox. PRR was looking for an ancient engine to display at the 1939-1940 NY Worlds Fair. They came out and looked at the Birdsboro engine and discovered it was a PRR H3. Number 1187. That's right, PRR 1187 worked at an industrial site in Birdsboro.

PRR acquired the engine, added it to the Historic Collection, and now it's restored scross the street from SRC at RR Museum of PA, on display in Rolling Stock Hall.

https://rrmuseumpa.org/wp-content/uploads/PRR-1187.jpg

Phil Mulligan

Page 4 of 5 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/