Moderating technology VS Lawsuit

Robby Peartree · **Joined:** Wed Aug 25, 2004 11:16 am **Posts:** 767

Mr. Rolands,

Because quite simply just answering the question does not address the issue of how the board is moderated. Too many times I see on boards asking people if they used the search function. How many pieces of Rypn do I need to search to find something? It is bad enough when a thread discussing x is labeled something completely different. Will further post be treated the same way? Simply just answering the question and ignoring the way the topic was handled does not address the issue. Is it just as easy for you to move it back as it is for some of us just to answer it?

Robby Peartree

Scranton Yard · **Joined:** Thu Feb 27, 2014 10:08 am **Posts:** 706

Since we are discussing the guidelines:

Quote:

Appeals Process

Posters are welcome to inquire further about the reasoning behind a moderating action. However, the following course of action MUST be followed: The poster must contact the moderator who made the decision. If the poser remains unsatisfied, he may request the moderator to refer the case to the RYPN Board of Directors for review. A board member will be assigned to review the case. The poster must abide by the guidelines set forth by the board member for handling the review. The decision of the board member reviewing the case will be final.

Under no circumstances may a poster contest the moderators’ decision of a specific case using the INTERCHANGE, or otherwise attempt to “arouse the masses.” Such posts will constitute a violation of INTERCHANGE policy. Under no circumstances will the moderators or the Board of Directors tolerate threatening or other abusive communications.

Moderating technology VS Lawsuit

Who is online